®Planning appeal decision
167B Mudeford, CHRISTCHURCH, BH23 4AG
side extension comprising of garage with en-suite over. Rear en-suite extension and small balcony to front. Internal remodelling
- Authority
- Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole
- Appeal type
- householder · Householder (HAS)
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Householder developments
- Inspector
- Roberts G
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether the proposed development would impact on the health and retention of protected trees
- the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area with particular regard to the appeal site's location within the conservation area and within the setting of nearby Listed Buildings
What decided it
The direct and indirect impacts on protected trees would be acceptable and could be adequately controlled by conditions, and the extensions would be subservient, proportional and set back, thus preserving the character and appearance of the conservation area and the setting of nearby Listed Buildings.
Framework references: 201, 202
Plan policies cited: HE2, HE3, HE1, KS1, BE4, BE15
The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.