Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Quashed On Legal Grounds30 May 20223282505

23 Cowley Crescent, UXBRIDGE, UB8 2HE

the development of a hip to gable roof enlargement, [and a] rear dormer roof extension adjoined to a two storey rear extension

Authority
London Borough of Hillingdon
Appeal type
enforcement · Enforcement Notice
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Hawkins S

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the matters alleged in the enforcement notice constitute a breach of planning control

What decided it

The appellant demonstrated that the combined volume of the roof works and the permitted extensions did not exceed the 50 m³ limit under GPDO Class B and satisfied all other relevant conditions, meaning the works were permitted development.

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.