Planning appeal decision
1 Roseberry Close, West End, Hoggeston, Buckinghamshire, MK18 3RR
retention of dwelling unrestricted as to occupancy
- Authority
- Buckinghamshire Council - Aylesbury Area *
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Hearing
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Cooper W
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- the effect of the change of use to residential garden on the character and appearance of the area
What decided it
The extended garden area was found not to harm the character and appearance of the area due to screening by vegetation and landform.
the proposal accords with the development plan as a whole and there are no other considerations which outweigh this finding, so the appeal succeeds
Plan policies cited: Policy NE1, Policy BE2, Policy NE4, Policy S1, Policy S3
Judgments cited: Finney v Welsh Ministers [2019] EWCA 1868; Wilson v West Sussex CC [1963] 2 W.L.R. 669; East Suffolk CC v Secretary of State for the Environment [1973] 1 WLUK 162
The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®