Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed12 July 20223282668

2 Rushymead Cottage Beaconsfield Road, Coleshill, AMERSHAM, HP7 0JZ

a part single and part two storey side/rear extension to the property

Authority
Buckinghamshire Council - Chiltern Area *
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Coombes A

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt for the purposes of the National Planning Policy Framework and Development Plan Policy
  • the effect of the proposal on openness and the purpose of including the land in the Green Belt
  • the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the dwelling and surrounding area
  • if found to be inappropriate development, whether the harm by reasons of inappropriateness, and any other harm, is clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the very special circumstances necessary to justify the development

What decided it

The proposed extension would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt by definition, causing demonstrable harm to openness and character and appearance, with no very special circumstances identified to justify approval.

Framework references: 147

Plan policies cited: Policy GB13, Policy GB2, Policy GC1, Policy LSQ1, Policy H15, Policy H16, Policy CS20, Policy CS22

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.