Town Planner Pro
Free trial
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed12 July 20223282668

2 Rushymead Cottage Beaconsfield Road, Coleshill, Amersham, HP7 0JZ

Planning appeal 3282668 at 2 Rushymead Cottage Beaconsfield Road, Coleshill, Amersham, HP7 0JZ (Buckinghamshire Council - Chiltern Area *) was dismissed on 12 July 2022 by Inspector Coombes A, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt for the purposes of the National Planning Policy Framework and Development Plan Policy.

a part single and part two storey side/rear extension to the property

Authority
Buckinghamshire Council - Chiltern Area *
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Coombes A
Postcode
HP7 0JZ

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt for the purposes of the National Planning Policy Framework and Development Plan Policy
  • the effect of the proposal on openness and the purpose of including the land in the Green Belt
  • the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the dwelling and surrounding area
  • if found to be inappropriate development, whether the harm by reasons of inappropriateness, and any other harm, is clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the very special circumstances necessary to justify the development

What decided it

The proposed extension would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt by definition, causing demonstrable harm to openness and character and appearance, with no very special circumstances identified to justify approval.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy GB13Policy GB2Policy GC1Policy LSQ1Policy H15Policy H16Policy CS20Policy CS22
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 147

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

Appeals plan, £15 a month

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

22 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Buckinghamshire Council - Chiltern Area

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022

  1. Dismissed1 April 20263372329
    118 Chalfont Road, Seer Green, Beaconsfield, HP9 2QP
  2. Notice varied and upheld12 March 20263325136
    Fenton Civil Engineering Ltd, Rowan Tree Farm Blackwell Hall Lane, Ley Hill, Chesham, HP5 1UN
  3. Unknown2 March 20263362050
    Land at National Society for Epilepsy, Chesham Lane, Chalfont St Peter, Buckinghamshire, HP8 4AD
  4. Notice upheld2 February 20263332205
    The Stables Frith Hill, South Heath, Great Missenden, HP16 9QF
  5. Dismissed23 January 20263372876
    Parkwood Farm Maltmans Lane, Chalfont St. Peter, Gerrards Cross, SL9 8RP

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.