Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed16 August 20223282925

168 Richmond Row, LIVERPOOL, L3 3BL

Authority
Liverpool City Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
change of use · Change of use
Inspector
Watson S

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of varying disputed condition 2 on highway safety and the living conditions of future occupiers
  • Whether disputed condition 13 is reasonable and necessary having regard to the effect of the development on nearby businesses and the living conditions of future occupiers

What decided it

Conditions 11 and 13 failed to meet the test in NPPF paragraph 54 as they removed permitted development rights without clear and necessary justification, while condition 2 as proposed would create unacceptable highway safety impacts for pedestrians.

Framework references: 54

Plan policies cited: EC4, TP1, UD2

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.