Planning appeal decision
159a High Street, Hampton Hill, TW12 1NL
Planning appeal 3283294 at 159a High Street, Hampton Hill, TW12 1NL (Richmond Upon Thames London Borough Council) was dismissed on 8 September 2022 by Inspector Jones RE, by written representations.
Alterations and extensions to roof and change of use from offices to three residential apartments
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Jones RE
- Postcode
- TW12 1NL
What decided it
Wicklow Homes submitted viability evidence only during the appeal process rather than at the planning application stage as required by Policy LP36, causing the Council to incur unnecessary costs for external consultant review that should have been borne by the developer earlier.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy LP36
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Richmond upon Thames
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022
- Dismissed28 October 2026601587988 Colne Road, Twickenham, TW2 6QE
- Dismissed28 October 2026601583664 First Avenue, Mortlake, London, SW14 8SR
- Dismissed26 October 2026601187461-63 Petersham Road, Richmond Upon Thames, TW10 6UT
- Dismissed20 October 20266010388163 Garrick House, High Street, Hampton Hill, TW12 1BZ
- Dismissed19 October 20266013760Pavement Os, 53-57 High Street, Whitton, TW2 7LB
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®