Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed15 July 20223283379

32 Vincent Square, Biggin Hill, nr Westerham, TN16 3EL

erection of garden shed on land at side and installation of trellising on top of boundary fence

Authority
London Borough of Bromley
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
other · Householder developments
Inspector
Davies E

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and the development plan

What decided it

The shed, as a modest domestic adjunct located immediately adjacent to the dwelling, could reasonably be considered an extension rather than inappropriate new building, and would not constitute a disproportionate addition over and above the size of the original building.

Framework references: 149, 150

Plan policies cited: Policy 49, Policy 51

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.