Planning appeal decision
32 Vincent Square, Biggin Hill, nr Westerham, TN16 3EL
erection of garden shed on land at side and installation of trellising on top of boundary fence
- Authority
- London Borough of Bromley
- Appeal type
- householder · Householder (HAS)
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- other · Householder developments
- Inspector
- Davies E
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and the development plan
What decided it
The shed, as a modest domestic adjunct located immediately adjacent to the dwelling, could reasonably be considered an extension rather than inappropriate new building, and would not constitute a disproportionate addition over and above the size of the original building.
Framework references: 149, 150
Plan policies cited: Policy 49, Policy 51
The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®