Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed8 September 20223283632

Kokoro No Tomo Taggs Island, Hampton, TW12 2HA

Planning appeal 3283632 at Kokoro No Tomo Taggs Island, Hampton, TW12 2HA (Richmond Upon Thames London Borough Council) was dismissed on 8 September 2022 by Inspector Jones RE, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the proposal would be inappropriate development on MOL, having regard to the Green Belt policies in the revised National Planning Policy Framework and any relevant development plan policies.

removal of existing one-storey houseboat and mooring piles and construction of replacement two-storey houseboat with mooring piles

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Jones RE
Postcode
TW12 2HA

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the proposal would be inappropriate development on MOL, having regard to the Green Belt policies in the revised National Planning Policy Framework and any relevant development plan policies
  • the effect on the openness of the MOL
  • whether any harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposal

What decided it

The proposal would constitute inappropriate development on MOL causing substantial harm to openness through a significant vertical uplift and increased massing, and the other considerations raised did not amount to very special circumstances capable of outweighing this harm.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy LP13Policy G3
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 143Paragraph 145Paragraph 148Paragraph 149

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

283 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Richmond upon Thames

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022

  1. Dismissed26 October 20266011874
    61-63 Petersham Road, Richmond Upon Thames, TW10 6UT
  2. Dismissed6 August 20266007949
    The Lensbury, Broom Road, London, TW11 9NU
  3. Split Decision10 March 20263333609
    Pontoon and Land Adjacent to Richmond Bridge Pier, Richmond Riverside, Richmond, TW9 1TH
  4. Allowed27 January 20266001465
    The Boathouse, Ranelagh Drive, Twickenham, TW1 1QZ
  5. Dismissed21 August 20243345719
    57 Rosecroft Gardens, London, TW2 7PT

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.