Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed12 July 20233283683

Biddlestone Farm, Llangarron, ROSS-ON-WYE, HR9 6NT

The retention of 6 existing caravans/replacement residential demountable ‘pods’ and the installation of 6 demountable modular welfare (non-residential) units (toilets, mess, etc.)

Authority
Herefordshire Council
Appeal type
major · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Hearing
Development
agricultural · Other Major Developments
Inspector
Board D

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area (A, D, E, F)
  • Whether the scheme would be at risk from flooding, having particular regard to sustainable drainage (A, B, C, D, E, F, G)
  • The effect of the proposal on highway safety (A, C, E, F)
  • Whether the scheme would make appropriate provision for green infrastructure (A, B)
  • The effect on protected species (C)
  • The effect of the scheme on the River Wye SAC and SSSI, designated European conservation sites (A, B, C, D, E, F, G)

What decided it

The unresolved harm to landscape character from the scale of the polytunnels and ancillary buildings, combined with the inability to rule out likely significant adverse effects on the River Wye SAC/SSSI, outweighed the benefits and led to dismissal of all seven appeals.

The economic and agricultural diversification benefits of the soft fruit enterprise did not outweigh the conflict with the development plan arising from harm to character and appearance (Appeals A, D, E, F), harm to protected species from an inadequate mitigation strategy (Appeal C), and unresolved risk to the integrity of the River Wye SAC/SSSI (Appeals A-G)

Framework references: 166

Plan policies cited: SS6, LD1, EMP1, SD3, SS7, SD4, SS4, MT1, LD2, LD3, SS1, SS5, RA6, E1, RA3

Judgments cited: Morge (FC) (Appellant) v Hampshire County Council (Respondent) - Judgement dated 19 January 2011; R (on the application of Christopher Prideaux) Buckinghamshire County Council v FCC Environment UK Limited - Judgement dated 29 April 2013

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.