Planning appeal decision
25 Barclay Road, London, SW6 1EJ
Planning appeal 3283853 at 25 Barclay Road, London, SW6 1EJ (London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham) was dismissed on 27 March 2023 by Inspector Sylvester G, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the host property and area, and whether it would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the Barclay Road Conservation Area.
a two storey rear extension of existing external roof terrace
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Other minor developments
- Inspector
- Sylvester G
- Postcode
- SW6 1EJ
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the host property and area, and whether it would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the Barclay Road Conservation Area
- the living conditions of the occupiers of No 27 Barclay Road, having particular regard to outlook and access to light
What decided it
The significantly harmful effect on the character and appearance of the Barclay Road Conservation Area, combined with harm to neighbouring outlook, could not be justified by private benefits of additional living space, and the proposal failed to preserve or enhance the conservation area contrary to section 72(1) of the Planning (Listed Building and Conservation Areas) Act 1990 and local plan policy.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy DC1Policy DC4Policy DC8Policy HO11Key Principle CAG2Key Principle CAG3Key Principle HS7
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 202Paragraph 130
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2023
- Allowed27 October 2026601087847, Mendora Road, London, SW6 7ND
- Dismissed1 October 20266010445Pavement Outside 498-504 Fulham Road, London, SW6 5NH
- Dismissed1 October 20266010443Pavement Outside 498-504 Fulham Road, London, SW6 5NH
- Allowed23 September 20266010549The Triangle, 5 - 17 Hammersmith Grove, London, W6 0LG
- Unknown18 September 20263356900Unit 1D, Woodstock Studios, 36 Woodstock Grove, London, W12 8LE
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®