Planning appeal decision
59 Alder Grove, LONDON, NW2 7DE
without planning permission, the erection of a building in the rear garden of the premises (shown hatched in black on the attached Plan A) for uses which are not incidental to the main dwelling house
- Authority
- London Borough of Brent
- Appeal type
- enforcement · Enforcement Notice
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- other · Householder developments
- Inspector
- Hand S
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the structure or parts of it constitute permitted development and are immune from enforcement action
- Whether the building as constructed causes harm to character and appearance, overlooking and amenity through overdevelopment
What decided it
The application of the Tapecrown principle requiring consideration of alternative remedial solutions meant that a reduced building restricted to incidental use by conditions would overcome the identified harms of overdevelopment, overbearing appearance and overlooking without requiring complete demolition.
Plan policies cited: CP17
The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®