Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed30 March 20223284479

Land Between Woodchurch Road and Appledore Road, Tenterden, Kent, TN30 7AY

Planning appeal 3284479 at Land Between Woodchurch Road and Appledore Road, Tenterden, Kent, TN30 7AY (Ashford Borough Council) was allowed on 30 March 2022 by Inspector Whitehead M, following an inquiry. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The Council's five-year Housing Land Supply (HLS) position in accordance with the National Planning Policy Framework.

Outline permission for up to 141 dwellings (50% affordable), access, roads, footways and cycleways and open space, plus full permission for change of use from agricultural land to a country park, formal sports pitches and pavilion with associated accesses, parking, drainage and landscaping

Appeal type
major · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Inquiry
Development
residential · Major dwellings
Inspector
Whitehead M
Postcode
TN30 7AY

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The Council's five-year Housing Land Supply (HLS) position in accordance with the National Planning Policy Framework
  • The effect of the proposal on the sustainable distribution of housing development in the Borough
  • Its effect on the character and appearance of the surrounding area, including its effect on existing trees
  • Its effect on ecology and biodiversity
  • Its effect on community space and facilities in the area
  • Its effect on pedestrian access and safety in the area, with particular regard to an unconfirmed Public Right of Way (PRoW) AB70

What decided it

The Council's inability to demonstrate a five-year housing land supply engaged the tilted balance, and the benefits of the scheme (particularly housing and affordable housing delivery) were not significantly and demonstrably outweighed by the identified harm to character and appearance.

The substantial benefits of market and affordable housing delivery, together with moderate/minor benefits to ecology, recreation, community facilities and drainage, were not significantly and demonstrably outweighed by the substantial harm to character and appearance, so the tilted balance favoured allowing the appeal despite conflict with the development plan as a whole.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy SP1Policy SP2Policy SP6Policy HOU1Policy HOU5Policy HOU6Policy HOU12Policy HOU15Policy ENV1Policy ENV3aPolicy ENV4Policy TRA3Policy TRA5Policy TRA6Policy IMP1Policy IMP2Policy IMP4Policy COM1Policy COM2Policy COM3Policy COM4Policy TEN NP2
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 11Paragraph 56Paragraph 62Paragraph 65Paragraph 69Paragraph 174Paragraph 180Paragraph 219

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

17 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Ashford Borough Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022

  1. Dismissed8 October 20266012673
    Land 150metres East by Southeast of Barkleys Farm, Burnthouse Lane, Smarden, TN27 8QQ
  2. Dismissed15 July 20266006719
    Barn 2, Golden Wood Farm, Brisley Lane, Ruckinge, TN26 2PW
  3. Allowed9 April 20263368725
    Land Adjacent to the Bull Inn, Bethersden, Ashford, TN26 3LB
  4. Dismissed7 April 20266003396
    Barn South of Chart Court Barn, Pluckley Road, Little Chart, Ashford, Kent, TN27 0QH
  5. Allowed30 March 20266002407
    Belvedere Stables, High Halden Road, Nr Ashford, Kent, TN30 6SY

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.