Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed16 December 20213285054

6 Park Shaw, Sedlescombe, BATTLE, TN33 0PP

the erection of a single rear dormer, replacement of a single side garage with a car port with a hipped roof, a single-storey rear extension, a front Velux dormer & front porch

Authority
Rother District Council
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Allan J

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of 6 Park Shaw and the wider street scene
  • the living conditions at 2 and 4 Park Shaw with particular regard to visual impact and privacy

What decided it

The proposal would be harmful to the character and appearance of the dwelling and wider street scene through its incongruous design elements that fail to respect the simple, uniform architectural character of the area.

The benefit of providing additional living space to the occupier was outweighed by the significant harm to the character and appearance of the dwelling and street scene, with no balancing exercise capable of overcoming the design conflicts with the development plan.

Plan policies cited: Policy DHG9: Extensions, Alterations and Outbuildings, Policy OSS4: General Development Considerations, Policy EN3: Design Quality, Policy EN1: Landscape Stewardship, Policy DEN1: Maintaining Landscape Character, Policy DEN2: The High Weald Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty (AONB)

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.