6 Park Shaw, Sedlescombe, Battle, TN33 0PP

Planning appeal 3285054 at 6 Park Shaw, Sedlescombe, Battle, TN33 0PP (Rother District Council) was dismissed on 16 December 2021 by Inspector Allan J, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of 6 Park Shaw and the wider street scene.

the erection of a single rear dormer, replacement of a single side garage with a car port with a hipped roof, a single-storey rear extension, a front Velux dormer & front porch

Authority: Rother District Council
Appeal type: householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure: Written Representations
Development: residential · Householder developments
Inspector: Allan J
Postcode: TN33 0PP

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of 6 Park Shaw and the wider street scene
the living conditions at 2 and 4 Park Shaw with particular regard to visual impact and privacy

What decided it

The proposal would be harmful to the character and appearance of the dwelling and wider street scene through its incongruous design elements that fail to respect the simple, uniform architectural character of the area.

The benefit of providing additional living space to the occupier was outweighed by the significant harm to the character and appearance of the dwelling and street scene, with no balancing exercise capable of overcoming the design conflicts with the development plan.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies: Policy DHG9: Extensions, Alterations and OutbuildingsPolicy OSS4: General Development ConsiderationsPolicy EN3: Design QualityPolicy EN1: Landscape StewardshipPolicy DEN1: Maintaining Landscape CharacterPolicy DEN2: The High Weald Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty (AONB)

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

Appeals plan, £15 a month

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

8 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision

An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter — Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.

Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app — Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.

Start your free trial

More decisions in Rother District Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2021

Dismissed22 October 20266015532
65 Westfield Lane, St Leonards on Sea, TN37 7NF
Dismissed14 October 20266007775
Land Adjacent to Broadlawns, Whitebread Lane, Beckley, TN31 6TY
Dismissed12 October 20266010105
Upper Morgay Wood, Junction Road, Staplecross, TN32 5SH
Dismissed22 September 20266008634
Barn House, Warren Road, Fairlight, TN35 4AN
Allowed21 September 20266009677
Black Cottage, Henley Down, Catsfield, TN33 9BN

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.