Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Notice varied and upheld2 February 20233285099

Land Lying to the east of Chestnut Avenue known as 91 Park View Road, UXBRIDGE, UB8 3LN

Authority
London Borough of Hillingdon
Appeal type
enforcement · Enforcement Notice
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
employment-industrial · Minor general industry/storage/warehousing
Inspector
Whitfield J

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Appeal A: whether the alleged breach of planning control has occurred as a matter of fact; whether the steps required exceed what is necessary; whether the time for compliance is reasonable
  • Appeal B: whether the structures constitute development; whether the development is inappropriate development in the Green Belt and its effect on openness; whether very special circumstances exist to justify the development
  • Appeal C: whether the development is inappropriate development in the Green Belt and its effect on openness; the effect on character and appearance; the effect on living conditions of neighbouring properties; whether very special circumstances exist to justify the development

What decided it

The development constitutes inappropriate development in the Green Belt with substantial harm to openness and character, and the appellant failed to demonstrate very special circumstances to justify the development as the identified benefits do not clearly outweigh the substantial Green Belt harm.

Framework references: 147, 148, 149, 150

Plan policies cited: London Plan Policy G2, Hillingdon Local Plan Part 1 Policy EM2, Hillingdon Local Plan Part 2 Policy DMEI4, Hillingdon Local Plan Part 1 Policy BE1, Hillingdon Local Plan Part 2 Policy DMHB11

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.