Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed5 January 20223285422

42 Prospect Crescent, TWICKENHAM, TW2 7EA

described on the application form as “Erection of first floor rear extension

Authority
Richmond Upon Thames London Borough Council
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Dale A

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effects of the proposed extension upon the character and appearance of the dwelling and its immediate surroundings
  • The effects upon the amenity and living conditions of the neighbours at 44 Prospect Crescent with regard to the potential for any visually intrusive or overbearing effects

What decided it

The proposed extension would be harmful to the character and appearance of the dwelling and its immediate surroundings, conflicting with Policy LP 1 and the SPD guidance on design quality.

Plan policies cited: Policy LP 1, Policy LP 8

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.