Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed29 April 20223285492

221 Highfield Road, Romford, RM5 3AN

Planning appeal 3285492 at 221 Highfield Road, Romford, RM5 3AN (London Borough of Havering) was dismissed on 29 April 2022 by Inspector Clarke B, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the development upon the character and appearance of the surrounding area.

the erection of part-two, part-single storey extension to side to create a one-bedroom, two-person dwelling house with associated amenity space, new vehicular crossover and parking, cycle and bin stores

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Clarke B
Postcode
RM5 3AN

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the development upon the character and appearance of the surrounding area
  • whether appropriate living conditions would be provided for the future occupiers of the development, with particular reference to internal space

What decided it

The proposed development would cause significant harm to the character and appearance of the surrounding area and would fail to provide appropriate living conditions for future occupiers, with these adverse effects significantly and demonstrably outweighing the limited housing and economic benefits.

The presumption in favour of sustainable development was engaged due to housing under-delivery, but the significant harm arising from the development to character and appearance and living conditions significantly and demonstrably outweighed the limited benefits of housing contribution and economic benefits.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Local Plan Policy 26Local Plan Policy 7London Plan Policy D6
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 11

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

169 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Havering

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022

  1. Dismissed5 August 20263362455
    10 Avenue Road, Harold Wood, Romford, RM3 0SU
  2. Dismissed5 August 20263354668
    145v Turpin Avenue, , Romford, Havering, RM5 2LU
  3. Unknown4 August 20263360523
    22 Nelmes Crescent, Hornchurch, RM11 2QB
  4. Notice varied and upheld4 August 20263360522
    22 Nelmes Crescent, Hornchurch, RM11 2QB
  5. Dismissed4 August 20263359688
    30 Crow Lane, Romford, RM7 0EL

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.