Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed11 March 20223285730

Judge Heath Lane, Hayes, LONDON, UB3 1JP

Proposed 15m Phase 8 Monopole C/W wrapround Cabinet at base and associated ancillary works

Authority
London Borough of Hillingdon
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
telecoms · Other minor developments
Inspector
Scott A

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the siting and appearance of the proposed installation on the monopole and, if any harm would occur, whether this is outweighed by the need for the installation to be sited as proposed taking into account any suitable alternatives

What decided it

The significant harm to the character and appearance of the local area caused by the visually intrusive siting of the monopole was not outweighed by the public benefits of 5G deployment, particularly given the limited exploration of alternative sites.

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.