Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed14 April 20223285732

4 Aubury Place, LONDON, W12 9DF

Single storey side extension

Authority
London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Scott A

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether or not it would have a harmful effect upon protected trees
  • The effect of the loss of landscaping on the character and appearance of the Ravenscourt and Starch Green Conservation area
  • Whether or not the proposal would result in a highway and pedestrian safety concern

What decided it

The absence of an arboricultural implications assessment and tree protection measures to demonstrate that the proposal would not cause damage to or loss of protected trees that contribute to the character and appearance of the conservation area.

Framework references: 56, 202

Plan policies cited: Policy DC8, Policy OS5, Policy T7, Key Principle CAG6

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.