Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Split Decision19 July 20223285999

47, Fielding Avenue, Twickenham, TW2 5LZ

described in the application form as: (i) A 2.75m high single storey rear extension projecting 3m; (ii) a two storey rear extension sited more than 2m from side boundary and 7m from rear boundary; (iii) a hip to gable extension with dormer extension (providing less than 50m3 additional volume); and (iv) rooflights and windows projecting less than 150mm from the roof slope

Authority
Richmond Upon Thames London Borough Council
Appeal type
ldc · Lawful Development Certificate
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Moss J

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the Council's decision to refuse to grant a certificate of lawful use or development was well founded

What decided it

The rear enlargement failed multiple criteria of Class A permitted development, but the roof works were found to be separately permissible under Classes B and C and could be carried out independently.

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.