Town Planner Pro
Free trial
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed13 April 20223286131

81-83, Inverness Terrace, London, W2 3JU

Planning appeal 3286131 at 81-83, Inverness Terrace, London, W2 3JU (City of Westminster Council) was dismissed on 13 April 2022 by Inspector O'Connor H, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the works and development have preserved and would preserve the Grade II listed building known as 41-95 Inverness Terrace and any of the features of special architectural or historic interest that it possesses.

Installation of 18 air conditioning units, replacement of rear elevation windows with uPVC windows, and Portland stone flooring and entrance steps in front porticoes

Authority
City of Westminster Council
Appeal type
other · Listed Building Consent & Conservation Area Consent Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
other · Other minor developments
Inspector
O'Connor H
Postcode
W2 3JU

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the works and development have preserved and would preserve the Grade II listed building known as 41-95 Inverness Terrace and any of the features of special architectural or historic interest that it possesses
  • The extent to which the character or appearance of the Bayswater Conservation Area has been or would be preserved or enhanced

What decided it

The less than substantial harm to the significance of the Grade II listed building and conservation area caused by the air conditioning units and uPVC windows was not outweighed by the limited public benefits of the scheme.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy 38Policy 39Policy 40
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 199Paragraph 202

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

Appeals plan, £15 a month

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

At least 816 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in City of Westminster Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022

  1. Dismissed28 October 20266012339
    1 Bear Street, London, WC2H 7DZ
  2. Dismissed28 October 20266009920
    25 Monmouth Road, London, W2 4UT
  3. Dismissed21 October 20266014604
    South Terrace, Third and Fourth Floor, 4 Matthew Parker Street, London, SW1H 9NP
  4. Dismissed21 October 20266012002
    Flat B, 9 Durham Terrace, London, W2 5PB
  5. Allowed21 October 20266011405
    17 Bruton Street, London, W1J 6QB

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.