Planning appeal decision
Land Rear of 33 Petersham Road, Richmond, TW10 6UH
Planning appeal 3286794 at Land Rear of 33 Petersham Road, Richmond, TW10 6UH (Richmond Upon Thames London Borough Council) was dismissed on 21 November 2022 by Inspector Dyer S, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the decision by the Council to refuse to grant a Lawful Development Certificate is well-founded.
the construction of rear extension projecting 4 metres from the rear of the existing dwelling
- Appeal type
- ldc · Lawful Development Certificate
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Householder developments
- Inspector
- Dyer S
- Postcode
- TW10 6UH
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the decision by the Council to refuse to grant a Lawful Development Certificate is well-founded
What decided it
The Article 4 Direction restricting development involving formation of usable space below ordinary ground level removes permitted development rights for the proposed extension, requiring express planning permission.
The decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Richmond upon Thames
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022
- Dismissed28 October 2026601587988 Colne Road, Twickenham, TW2 6QE
- Dismissed28 October 2026601583664 First Avenue, Mortlake, London, SW14 8SR
- Dismissed26 October 2026601187461-63 Petersham Road, Richmond Upon Thames, TW10 6UT
- Dismissed20 October 20266010388163 Garrick House, High Street, Hampton Hill, TW12 1BZ
- Dismissed19 October 20266013760Pavement Os, 53-57 High Street, Whitton, TW2 7LB
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®