Planning appeal decision
Cross Waters Farm, Eldesborough, Dunstable, LU6 2EE
Planning appeal 3287114 at Cross Waters Farm, Eldesborough, Dunstable, LU6 2EE (Central Bedfordshire) was dismissed on 28 July 2022 by Inspector Pipkin R, following a hearing. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework (the Framework) and any relevant development plan policies.
a permanent farm manager’s dwelling to supervise an arable enterprise
- Authority
- Central Bedfordshire
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Hearing
- Development
- agricultural · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Pipkin R
- Postcode
- LU6 2EE
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework (the Framework) and any relevant development plan policies
- the effect of the proposal on the openness of the Green Belt
- whether there is an essential need for a rural workers dwelling in the countryside
- the effect of the proposed development on the Chilterns Beechwoods SAC
- if the proposal is inappropriate development, whether the harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations. If so, would this amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposal
What decided it
The lack of a demonstrated essential need for a rural workers dwelling, combined with the substantial harm from inappropriate development and harm to openness in the Green Belt, meant the minor benefits could not amount to the very special circumstances required.
the substantial harm from inappropriateness and openness in the Green Belt, together with modest environmental harms, was not outweighed by the minor economic and private benefits, so very special circumstances did not exist
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy SP4Policy DC3Policy HQ1
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 147Paragraph 149Paragraph 137Paragraph 80Paragraph 148
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Central Bedfordshire
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022
- Dismissed15 September 20266007334Hillcrest, Chalton, Luton, LU4 9UB
- Allowed4 September 202660072022 Park Farm, Park Road, Westoning, MK45 5LA
- Dismissed7 August 20266007254Wheatsheaf Barn, Mount Pleasant, Aspley Guise, MK178JZ
- Dismissed10 July 20266005439263 Sharpenhoe Road, Streatley, LU3 3PP
- Dismissed8 July 20266007697142 Sharpenhoe Road, Streatley, Luton, LU3 3PS
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®