Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed1 April 20223287204

60 Biddick Lane, Fatfield, WASHINGTON, NE38 8AA

described on the application form as ‘This will be a Single Storey Extension with a Pitched roof from centre Width 6 meters Height 3.8m Patio Doors to rear Windows to rear Roof tiles and Rendering finish. This will be 200mm away from the house boundary line

Authority
Sunderland City Council
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Coyne C

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposed development on the living conditions of the neighbouring occupiers of no. 62 Biddick Lane having regard to matters of outlook

What decided it

The proposed extension would create an unacceptable tunnelling and overbearing effect on the outlook from the neighbouring property's habitable room window, thereby materially harming the living conditions of the occupiers of no. 62 Biddick Lane.

Plan policies cited: Policy BH1 of the adopted Sunderland Core Strategy and Development Plan

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.