Town Planner Pro
Free trial
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed1 April 20223287204

60 Biddick Lane, Fatfield, Washington, NE38 8AA

Planning appeal 3287204 at 60 Biddick Lane, Fatfield, Washington, NE38 8AA (Sunderland City Council) was dismissed on 1 April 2022 by Inspector Coyne C, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the proposed development on the living conditions of the neighbouring occupiers of no. 62 Biddick Lane having regard to matters of outlook.

described on the application form as ‘This will be a Single Storey Extension with a Pitched roof from centre Width 6 meters Height 3.8m Patio Doors to rear Windows to rear Roof tiles and Rendering finish. This will be 200mm away from the house boundary line

Authority
Sunderland City Council
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Coyne C
Postcode
NE38 8AA

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposed development on the living conditions of the neighbouring occupiers of no. 62 Biddick Lane having regard to matters of outlook

What decided it

The proposed extension would create an unacceptable tunnelling and overbearing effect on the outlook from the neighbouring property's habitable room window, thereby materially harming the living conditions of the occupiers of no. 62 Biddick Lane.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy BH1 of the adopted Sunderland Core Strategy and Development Plan

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

Appeals plan, £15 a month

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

12 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Sunderland

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022

  1. Allowed5 October 20266006514
    1 Grayling Court, Doxford International, Sunderland, SR3 3XE
  2. Allowed25 September 20266004934
    105 Wellburn Road, Washington, NE37 1DD
  3. Planning permission granted15 September 20263368726
    47 Roker Park Road, Sunderland, SR6 9PL
  4. Dismissed14 September 20266011401
    1 Rothbury, Sunderland, SR2 0BE
  5. Allowed10 September 20266010644
    2 Crowther Road, Crowther, Washington, NE38 0AA

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.