Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed17 November 20223287287

41, Kensington Square, London, W8 5HP

Planning appeal 3287287 at 41, Kensington Square, London, W8 5HP (Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea) was allowed on 17 November 2022 by Inspector Jones M, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the proposal on the special architectural and historic interest of the Grade II Listed building and whether it would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the Kensington Square Conservation Area.

removal of non-original garden surfaces and sunken garden area and the formation of an ornamental swimming pond. Replacement of existing non-original garden gazebo and replacement with new gazebo together with new natural stone planter edgings and garden surfaces. Installation of energy efficient water conditioning equipment

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Other minor developments
Inspector
Jones M
Postcode
W8 5HP

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposal on the special architectural and historic interest of the Grade II Listed building and whether it would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the Kensington Square Conservation Area

What decided it

The gazebo design and garden improvements would restore refinement to the garden setting, preserve the listed building's special interest, and enhance the conservation area character through a more harmonised interface between the residential opulence of Kensington Square and the Barker's Building.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy CL1Policy CL2Policy CL3Policy CL4Policy CL6Policy CL11

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

At least 796 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022

  1. Allowed19 May 20266002487
    80 Oxford Gardens, London, W10 5UW
  2. Split Decision26 August 20253359537
    1 Cathcart Road, London , London , SW10 9NL
  3. Allowed27 March 20253355443
    74 Addison Road, London, W14 8EB
  4. Allowed27 March 20253354547
    42 Chepstow Villas, London, W11 2QY
  5. Allowed24 January 20253351474
    74 Addison Road, London, W14 8EB

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.