Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed27 May 20223287408

AREA OF EXISTING FOOTPATH AT 164 PRIORY ROAD, PRIORY ROAD, BIRMINGHAM, B28 0TG

a 5G telecoms installation: H3G Phase 8 15m high street pole c/w wrap-around cabinet and 3 further additional equipment cabinets

Authority
Birmingham City Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
telecoms · Minor retail and services
Inspector
Hall R

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of siting and appearance of the proposed installation on the character and appearance of the area and the outlook from nearby houses, and if any harm would occur, whether this is outweighed by the need for the installation to be sited as proposed taking into account any suitable alternative

What decided it

The harm to character and appearance and outlook from the prominent and dominant appearance of the monopole in an open residential street scene was not outweighed by the need for the installation to be sited as proposed, given the lack of robust consideration of suitable alternatives.

Plan policies cited: Policy PG3, Policy DM16

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.