Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed20 May 20223287602

16 Selborne Avenue, HAVANT, Hampshire, PO9 4PX

‘a two-storey new build dwelling to end of existing terrace’

Authority
Havant Borough Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Chamberlain G

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the appeal site is a suitable location for the proposal, having regard to policies concerned with development in areas at risk of flooding
  • The effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area
  • The effect of the proposed development on the living conditions of the occupants of 16 Selborne Avenue and 32 Overton Crescent, with reference to outlook, sunlight and privacy, and future occupants with reference to the size and configuration of outdoor amenity space

What decided it

The appellant failed to demonstrate that sequentially preferable sites were not reasonably available and appropriate, thereby failing the sequential test required by Policy CS15 and the Framework, which provides a clear reason for refusal that engages the exception to the tilted balance.

the significant harm arising from flood risk policy non-compliance, character and appearance harm, and living conditions harm outweighed the moderate cumulative benefits of housing delivery and economic support, which did not constitute material considerations indicating the proposal should be determined otherwise than in accordance with the development plan

Framework references: 162, 160, 130, 130(f), 11d)

Plan policies cited: Policy CS15 of the Havant Borough Core Strategy 2011, Policy CS16 of the Havant Borough Core Strategy 2011, Policy LP2 of the Havant Borough Local Plan (Allocations) 2014, Borough Design Guide Supplementary Planning Document

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.