Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed11 August 20223287663

Bennetts Cottage, Whipsnade, DUNSTABLE, LU6 2LG

the construction of detached carport

Authority
Central Bedfordshire
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
other · Other minor developments
Inspector
Gunn J

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the proposed development would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt
  • the effect of the proposal on the openness of the Green Belt
  • the effect on the character and appearance of the Chilterns Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty (AONB)
  • whether the proposed development would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the Whipsnade Conservation Area (CA)
  • if the proposed development is inappropriate, whether the harm to the Green Belt by way of inappropriateness and any other harm, is clearly outweighed by other considerations so as to amount to very special circumstances necessary to justify it

What decided it

The substantial weight given to harm to the Green Belt by inappropriateness and loss of openness was not clearly outweighed by other considerations, and very special circumstances did not exist.

Framework references: 149, 148, 176, 197

Plan policies cited: Policy SP4, Policy HQ1, Policy EE7, Policy HE3

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.