Town Planner Pro
Free trial
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed11 August 20223287663

Bennetts Cottage, Whipsnade, Dunstable, LU6 2LG

Planning appeal 3287663 at Bennetts Cottage, Whipsnade, Dunstable, LU6 2LG (Central Bedfordshire) was dismissed on 11 August 2022 by Inspector Gunn J, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the proposed development would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt.

the construction of detached carport

Authority
Central Bedfordshire
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
other · Other minor developments
Inspector
Gunn J
Postcode
LU6 2LG

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the proposed development would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt
  • the effect of the proposal on the openness of the Green Belt
  • the effect on the character and appearance of the Chilterns Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty (AONB)
  • whether the proposed development would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the Whipsnade Conservation Area (CA)
  • if the proposed development is inappropriate, whether the harm to the Green Belt by way of inappropriateness and any other harm, is clearly outweighed by other considerations so as to amount to very special circumstances necessary to justify it

What decided it

The substantial weight given to harm to the Green Belt by inappropriateness and loss of openness was not clearly outweighed by other considerations, and very special circumstances did not exist.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy SP4Policy HQ1Policy EE7Policy HE3
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 149Paragraph 148Paragraph 176Paragraph 197

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

Appeals plan, £15 a month

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

17 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Central Bedfordshire

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022

  1. Dismissed15 September 20266007334
    Hillcrest, Chalton, Luton, LU4 9UB
  2. Allowed4 September 20266007202
    2 Park Farm, Park Road, Westoning, MK45 5LA
  3. Dismissed7 August 20266007254
    Wheatsheaf Barn, Mount Pleasant, Aspley Guise, MK178JZ
  4. Dismissed10 July 20266005439
    263 Sharpenhoe Road, Streatley, LU3 3PP
  5. Dismissed8 July 20266007697
    142 Sharpenhoe Road, Streatley, Luton, LU3 3PS

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.