Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed8 March 20223287694

22 Park Way, London, NW11 0EX

Planning appeal 3287694 at 22 Park Way, London, NW11 0EX (London Borough of Barnet) was dismissed on 8 March 2022 by Inspector Webb M, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the single and two-storey rear extensions on the character and appearance of the host dwelling and surrounding area.

the formation of new basement level and new rear terrace at ground floor level. Erection of single and two storey rear extension. Erection of two storey front bay extension. Roof extension involving rear and side dormer windows, 2no side facing rooflights to both sides and 1no front facing rooflight and external alterations

Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Webb M
Postcode
NW11 0EX

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the single and two-storey rear extensions on the character and appearance of the host dwelling and surrounding area
  • the effect of the two-storey rear extension on the living conditions of the occupiers of 24 Park Way, with regards to loss of light, outlook and whether there would be an overbearing impact

What decided it

The increased size of the proposed rear extensions would cause unacceptable harm to both the character and appearance of the host dwelling and surrounding area and the living conditions of neighbouring occupiers through loss of outlook and overbearing impact.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy CS5 of the Core StrategyPolicy DM01 of the Development Management PoliciesPolicy D3 of the London PlanSupplementary Planning Document: Residential Design Guidance

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

727 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Barnet

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022

  1. Notice varied and upheld29 September 20263359644
    35 Hillview Gardens, London, NW4 2JJ
  2. Allowed10 September 20266000405
    41 Brent Park Road, London, NW4 3HN
  3. Notice upheld28 August 20263361601
    53 Essex Park, London, N3 1ND
  4. Notice varied and upheld27 August 20263361348
    27 Dale Grove, London, N12 8EE
  5. Notice upheld26 August 20263376088
    48 Oldberry Road, Edgware, HA8 9DB

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.