Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed10 October 20223287730

Belgrave Road, Dresden, Stoke on Trent, ST3 4PR

Planning appeal 3287730 at Belgrave Road, Dresden, Stoke on Trent, ST3 4PR (Stoke-on-Trent City Council) was allowed on 10 October 2022 by Inspector Jones D, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the siting and appearance of the proposal on (i) the character and appearance of the area and (ii) the living conditions of occupiers of nearby residential properties with particular regard to outlook.

15.0m Phase 8 Monopole C/W wrapround cabinet at base and associated ancillary works

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
telecoms · Minor retail and services
Inspector
Jones D
Postcode
ST3 4PR

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the siting and appearance of the proposal on (i) the character and appearance of the area and (ii) the living conditions of occupiers of nearby residential properties with particular regard to outlook
  • if any harm is identified, whether it would be outweighed by the need for the installation to be sited as proposed taking into account any suitable alternatives

What decided it

The substantial social and economic benefits of 5G infrastructure, supported by evidence of a thorough sequential site selection process with no viable alternatives, outweighed the moderate harm to character and appearance.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy CSP1 of the Newcastle-under-Lyme and Stoke-on-Trent Core Spatial Strategy 2006-2026
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 114Paragraph 117

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

27 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Stoke-on-Trent City Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022

  1. Dismissed20 October 20266014211
    Trinity House, 43 - 45 Trinity Street, Stoke-on-Trent, ST1 5LQ
  2. Dismissed7 October 20266006210
    247 Endon Road, Norton, Stoke on Trent, ST6 8PA
  3. Dismissed7 September 20266010701
    96 Church Road, Blurton, Stoke-on-Trent, ST3 3BB
  4. Dismissed2 July 20266008137
    321 Hartshill Road, Stoke-on-trent, ST4 7NR
  5. Dismissed21 May 20266003824
    Land West of Spout Lane,, Baddeley Edge, Stoke-on-Trent, ST2 7LR

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.