Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed19 December 20223288036

1 May Street, Great Chishill, Royston, SG8 8SN

Planning appeal 3288036 at 1 May Street, Great Chishill, Royston, SG8 8SN (South Cambridgeshire District Council) was dismissed on 19 December 2022 by Inspector Norman R, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the proposal preserves the Grade II listed building, 1–5 May Street and Hope Cottages, 2–8 Hall Lane and its setting.

Rebuild the condemned boundary flint wall that was condemned county council in April 2020

Appeal type
other · Listed Building Consent & Conservation Area Consent Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
other · Other minor developments
Inspector
Norman R
Postcode
SG8 8SN

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the proposal preserves the Grade II listed building, 1–5 May Street and Hope Cottages, 2–8 Hall Lane and its setting
  • Whether the proposal preserves the setting of the adjacent Grade II* listed building, Parish Church of St Swithun, Barley Road
  • Whether the proposal preserves or enhances the character or appearance of the Great Chishill Conservation Area

What decided it

The form and layering of the flintwork in the rebuilt wall was too regular and uniform compared to surrounding historic boundary walls, causing it to fail to preserve the heritage assets and their settings, and this harm was not outweighed by the limited public benefits.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy HQ/1Policy NH/14
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 199Paragraph 201Paragraph 202

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

7 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in South Cambridgeshire

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022

  1. Allowed23 October 20266005101
    Land North of Pampisford Road, Great Abington, Cambridge, CB21 6AH
  2. Dismissed19 October 20266010417
    Land to Rear of No.9 Brewery Lane, Meldreth, Royston, SG8 6NS
  3. Dismissed19 October 20266008631
    19 Church Street, Steeple Morden, SG8 0NJ
  4. Dismissed16 October 20266011793
    Land to the Rear of Queen Adelaide PH, High Street, Croydon, SG8 0DT
  5. Allowed16 October 20266010543
    Bridgefoot Farm, Barley Road, Flint Cross, Great and Little Chishill, SG8 7PU

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.