Planning appeal decision
Hill House Wood Lane, Aspley Guise, Milton Keynes, MK17 8EJ
Planning appeal 3288099 at Hill House Wood Lane, Aspley Guise, Milton Keynes, MK17 8EJ (Central Bedfordshire) was dismissed on 24 November 2022 by Inspector Douglas L, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the proposed development would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and any relevant development plan policies.
the demolition of existing dwelling, garage and outbuilding; erection of three new dwellings with garages, associated access and landscaping
- Authority
- Central Bedfordshire
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Douglas L
- Postcode
- MK17 8EJ
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether the proposed development would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and any relevant development plan policies
- the effect of the proposed development on the openness of the Green Belt
- the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area, with particular regard to the Aspley Guise Conservation Area
- the effect of the proposed development on the living conditions of neighbouring residents, with particular regard to privacy and outlook
- the effect of the proposed development on highway safety
- the effect of the proposed development on biodiversity
- whether any harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the development
What decided it
The identified harms to the Green Belt (inappropriateness and loss of openness), Conservation Area significance, neighbouring living conditions, and highway safety were not clearly outweighed by the modest benefits of two additional dwellings, failing to establish the very special circumstances necessary to justify the development.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy SP4Policy HE3Policy HQ1Policy T2Policy EE2
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 110Paragraph 137Paragraph 138Paragraph 147Paragraph 148Paragraph 149
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Central Bedfordshire
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022
- Dismissed15 September 20266007334Hillcrest, Chalton, Luton, LU4 9UB
- Allowed4 September 202660072022 Park Farm, Park Road, Westoning, MK45 5LA
- Dismissed7 August 20266007254Wheatsheaf Barn, Mount Pleasant, Aspley Guise, MK178JZ
- Dismissed10 July 20266005439263 Sharpenhoe Road, Streatley, LU3 3PP
- Dismissed8 July 20266007697142 Sharpenhoe Road, Streatley, Luton, LU3 3PS
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®