Planning appeal decision
Four Trees River Hill, Flamstead, ST. ALBANS, AL3 8BY
Proposed detached garage with accommodation in the roof void”
- Authority
- Dacorum Borough Council
- Appeal type
- householder · Householder (HAS)
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- other · Householder developments
- Inspector
- Glaister C
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt for the purposes of the development plan and the National Planning Policy Framework (2021)
- the effect of the proposal on the openness of the Green Belt
- the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area
- if the proposal would be inappropriate development, whether the harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, is clearly outweighed by other considerations so as to amount to the very special circumstances necessary to justify it
What decided it
The proposal constitutes inappropriate development in the Green Belt that is harmful by definition, and the other considerations do not clearly outweigh this harm and the harm to openness and character and appearance, so very special circumstances do not exist.
Framework references: 147, 148, 149
Plan policies cited: CS5, CS6, CS11, CS12
The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®