Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed11 August 20223288255

Four Trees River Hill, Flamstead, ST. ALBANS, AL3 8BY

Proposed detached garage with accommodation in the roof void”

Authority
Dacorum Borough Council
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
other · Householder developments
Inspector
Glaister C

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt for the purposes of the development plan and the National Planning Policy Framework (2021)
  • the effect of the proposal on the openness of the Green Belt
  • the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area
  • if the proposal would be inappropriate development, whether the harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, is clearly outweighed by other considerations so as to amount to the very special circumstances necessary to justify it

What decided it

The proposal constitutes inappropriate development in the Green Belt that is harmful by definition, and the other considerations do not clearly outweigh this harm and the harm to openness and character and appearance, so very special circumstances do not exist.

Framework references: 147, 148, 149

Plan policies cited: CS5, CS6, CS11, CS12

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.