Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed21 September 20223288333

Tavistock Works, Tavistock Road, Yiewsley, WEST DRAYTON, UB7 7QX

the demolition of an existing building and its replacement with an up to 8-storey building comprising residential units and associated car parking, landscaping and amenity space

Authority
London Borough of Hillingdon
Appeal type
major · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Hearing
Development
residential · Major dwellings
Inspector
Plenty B

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area
  • The effect of the proposal on the living conditions of future occupiers with respect to the provision of external amenity space
  • The effect of the proposal on the living conditions of occupiers of Fitzroy Court, with particular respect to sunlight, daylight and outlook
  • Whether the proposed development would deliver all necessary planning obligations to satisfy the requirements of local and national policies

What decided it

The mirror-image daylight assessment demonstrated that Fitzroy Court's own proximity to the boundary meant it took more than its fair share of light, justifying the daylight reduction as acceptable and tipping the balance in favour of the scheme.

The benefits of well-designed housing delivery, accordance with the site allocation, and comprehensive regeneration outweighed the under-provision of on-site amenity space and the material deterioration in daylight to Fitzroy Court.

Plan policies cited: Policy D6 (London Plan), DMHB12, BE1, DMHB 10, DMHB 11, D1, D2, D3, D8, D9, DMHB 18, H5, DMH7, DMEI 1, DMEI 2, DMCI 4, DMC1 7, DF1, SA38, DMHB 17, SI 1, SI 2, SI 4, T4, EM8, DMEI 14, D7, D11, D12

Judgments cited: Rainbird v The Council of the London Borough of Tower Hamlets [2018] EWHC 657 (Admin)

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.