Planning appeal decision
Land Opposite 136-144 Wargrave Road, Twyford, RG10 9PN
Planning appeal 3288874 at Land Opposite 136-144 Wargrave Road, Twyford, RG10 9PN (Wokingham Borough Council) was allowed on 17 October 2022 by Inspector Nicholls H, following a hearing. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the proposal would constitute inappropriate development in the Green Belt with regard to the development plan, National Planning Policy Framework (the Framework) and PPTS.
replacement of stable building with residential mobile home and utility building and associated works
- Authority
- Wokingham Borough Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Hearing
- Development
- caravan-gypsy · Minor traveller and caravan pitches
- Inspector
- Nicholls H
- Postcode
- RG10 9PN
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether the proposal would constitute inappropriate development in the Green Belt with regard to the development plan, National Planning Policy Framework (the Framework) and PPTS
- the effect of the proposed development upon the openness of the Green Belt, and upon the purposes of the Green Belt in relation to safeguarding the countryside from encroachment
- whether the location of the proposal accords with local policies that seek to limit the need to travel by private vehicle
- the effect of the proposed development upon trees
- the effect of the proposed development upon the character and appearance of the area
- the need for, and provision of, accommodation for gypsies and travellers within the area
- the availability of alternative accommodation
- the personal circumstances of the proposed occupiers
- if inappropriate development, whether any harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations so as to amount to the very special circumstances necessary to justify the scheme in the Green Belt
What decided it
The best interests of the appellant's children, combined with the Council's inability to demonstrate a five-year supply of PPTS traveller pitches, outweighed the temporary (rather than permanent) Green Belt and character harm, amounting to very special circumstances justifying a temporary personal permission.
For a permanent permission the substantial Green Belt and other harms were not outweighed by other considerations, so permanent permission was refused; for a temporary permission, the personal circumstances (especially the best interests of the children) and the shortfall in PPTS pitch supply, weighed against only temporary Green Belt harm, clearly outweighed that harm, amounting to very special circumstances justifying a temporary five-year personal permission.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- CS Policy CP12MDD Policy TB01MDD Policy TB10CS Policy CP3MDD Policy CC03MDD Policy TB21
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 150
- Judgments
- Wheatcroft Ltd V SSE [1982]
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Wokingham Borough Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022
- Dismissed21 July 20266008845Pound Lane Cottage, Pound Lane, Hurst, RG10 0RS
- Allowed8 June 20263371069Land North of Reading Road, Arborfield, RG2 9HN
- Notice varied and upheld1 May 20263346384Old Billingbear Brickworks, Carters Hill, Binfield, Wokingham, RG40 5RS
- Notice upheld10 March 20263374730Land at Gravelley Bridge Farm, Grazeley Green Road, Grazeley, Reading, RG7 1LG
- Dismissed9 March 20263361360Land West of Limmerhill Road, Wokingham, RG41 4BY
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®