Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed17 October 20223288874

Land Opposite 136-144 Wargrave Road, Twyford, RG10 9PN

Planning appeal 3288874 at Land Opposite 136-144 Wargrave Road, Twyford, RG10 9PN (Wokingham Borough Council) was allowed on 17 October 2022 by Inspector Nicholls H, following a hearing. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the proposal would constitute inappropriate development in the Green Belt with regard to the development plan, National Planning Policy Framework (the Framework) and PPTS.

replacement of stable building with residential mobile home and utility building and associated works

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Hearing
Development
caravan-gypsy · Minor traveller and caravan pitches
Inspector
Nicholls H
Postcode
RG10 9PN

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the proposal would constitute inappropriate development in the Green Belt with regard to the development plan, National Planning Policy Framework (the Framework) and PPTS
  • the effect of the proposed development upon the openness of the Green Belt, and upon the purposes of the Green Belt in relation to safeguarding the countryside from encroachment
  • whether the location of the proposal accords with local policies that seek to limit the need to travel by private vehicle
  • the effect of the proposed development upon trees
  • the effect of the proposed development upon the character and appearance of the area
  • the need for, and provision of, accommodation for gypsies and travellers within the area
  • the availability of alternative accommodation
  • the personal circumstances of the proposed occupiers
  • if inappropriate development, whether any harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations so as to amount to the very special circumstances necessary to justify the scheme in the Green Belt

What decided it

The best interests of the appellant's children, combined with the Council's inability to demonstrate a five-year supply of PPTS traveller pitches, outweighed the temporary (rather than permanent) Green Belt and character harm, amounting to very special circumstances justifying a temporary personal permission.

For a permanent permission the substantial Green Belt and other harms were not outweighed by other considerations, so permanent permission was refused; for a temporary permission, the personal circumstances (especially the best interests of the children) and the shortfall in PPTS pitch supply, weighed against only temporary Green Belt harm, clearly outweighed that harm, amounting to very special circumstances justifying a temporary five-year personal permission.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
CS Policy CP12MDD Policy TB01MDD Policy TB10CS Policy CP3MDD Policy CC03MDD Policy TB21
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 150
Judgments
Wheatcroft Ltd V SSE [1982]

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

48 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Wokingham Borough Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022

  1. Dismissed21 July 20266008845
    Pound Lane Cottage, Pound Lane, Hurst, RG10 0RS
  2. Allowed8 June 20263371069
    Land North of Reading Road, Arborfield, RG2 9HN
  3. Notice varied and upheld1 May 20263346384
    Old Billingbear Brickworks, Carters Hill, Binfield, Wokingham, RG40 5RS
  4. Notice upheld10 March 20263374730
    Land at Gravelley Bridge Farm, Grazeley Green Road, Grazeley, Reading, RG7 1LG
  5. Dismissed9 March 20263361360
    Land West of Limmerhill Road, Wokingham, RG41 4BY

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.