Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed9 March 20263361360

Land West of Limmerhill Road, Wokingham, RG41 4BY

Planning appeal 3361360 at Land West of Limmerhill Road, Wokingham, RG41 4BY (Wokingham Borough Council) was dismissed on 9 March 2026 by Inspector Rose D, following an inquiry. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area including landscape and visual effects.

‘Outline Planning Application for up to 60 no. dwellings (use class C3) with associated public open space, landscaping, ecological enhancements, drainage and other supporting infrastructure, with access from Barkham Road (all other matters reserved )’.1

Appeal type
major · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Inquiry
Development
residential · Major dwellings
Inspector
Rose D
Postcode
RG41 4BY

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area including landscape and visual effects.
  • The effect of the proposal on the existing pattern of settlement; and the separate identities of Barkham and Wokingham.
  • Whether the characteristics of the site and the parameters of development would result in a well-designed place.
  • Whether the location is, or can be made, sustainable through limiting the need to travel and offering a genuine choice of travel modes.
  • Other material considerations.
  • As the policies which are most important for determining the application are agreed to be out-of-date, would the adverse effects of granting planning permission significantly and demonstrably outweigh the benefits of the development when assessed against the policies in the National Planning Policy Framework taken as a whole, having particular regard to key policies for directing development to sustainable locations, making effective use of land, securing well-designed places and providing affordable homes, individually or in combination.

What decided it

The failure of the outline parameters to achieve a well-designed place, causing harm of very significant magnitude, combined with the other identified harms, meant the adverse effects significantly and demonstrably outweighed the benefits.

The very significant weight given to market and affordable housing and moderate weight to other benefits were significantly and demonstrably outweighed by the harm to character and appearance, harm to the settlement pattern, and the very significant harm from the failure to achieve a well-designed place, leading to dismissal.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy CP17Local Plan Policy CC02Core Strategy Policy CP9Core Strategy Policy CP11Local Plan Policy CC01Core Strategy Policy CP1 (1)Core Strategy Policy CP3 (a) and (f)Core Strategy Policy CP1 (11)Core Strategy Policy CP2Core Strategy Policy CP6 (a, b and c)Policy CP5Local Plan Policy TB08Local Plan Policy TB12Policy NRM6 of the South East PlanPolicies CP8 and CP4 of the Core StrategyCore Strategy Policy CP1 (7)
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 187Paragraph 232Paragraph 234Paragraph 139

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

83 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Wokingham Borough Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026

  1. Dismissed21 July 20266008845
    Pound Lane Cottage, Pound Lane, Hurst, RG10 0RS
  2. Allowed2 February 20263375029
    1 Halstead Close, Woodley, Wokingham, Berkshire, RG5 4LD
  3. Allowed26 November 20253363174
    178 Bearwood Road, Barkham, Wokingham, RG41 4SH
  4. Dismissed27 October 20253364902
    Land East of Warren Lodge, Warren Lane, Finchampstead, RG40 4HR
  5. Dismissed17 September 20253365016
    Dukes Field Cottage Norton Road, Riseley, Reading, RG7 1SH

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.