Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed27 October 20253364902

Land East of Warren Lodge, Warren Lane, Finchampstead, RG40 4HR

Planning appeal 3364902 at Land East of Warren Lodge, Warren Lane, Finchampstead, RG40 4HR (Wokingham Borough Council) was dismissed on 27 October 2025 by Inspector Cuthbert L, following a hearing. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the development on the landscape character and appearance of the area.

Change of use of land for the siting of 2 no. Gypsy and Traveller pitches with creation of a second access off Finchampstead Road and associated installation of soft and hard landscaping.

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Hearing
Development
caravan-gypsy · Minor traveller and caravan pitches
Inspector
Cuthbert L
Postcode
RG40 4HR

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the development on the landscape character and appearance of the area
  • whether the site is a suitable location for the development, in respect of the spatial strategy for the area
  • the effect of the proposed development on trees, including the effect on Veteran Trees
  • whether the proposed development would provide satisfactory living conditions for future occupiers, in respect of external amenity space
  • whether the site would have access to local services and facilities and sustainable forms of transport
  • the effect of the development on highway safety, with specific regard to parking, turning and vehicular access
  • the effect of the proposal on the integrity of the Thames Basin Heath Special Protection Area (SPA)
  • whether any harm arising from the development would be outweighed by other considerations

What decided it

The combined and permanent harm to landscape character, the unsuitable out-of-settlement location, and the harm to protected/veteran trees (an irreplaceable habitat) outweighed the benefits, including the unmet pitch need and personal circumstances.

The significant weight given to unmet Gypsy and Traveller pitch need, lack of alternative sites, and the best interests of the child did not outweigh the significant and permanent harm to landscape character, unsuitable location, and harm to protected/veteran trees, so the balance tipped against the grant of permission.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy AHD3Policy TB10Policy CP1Policy CP2Policy CP3Policy CP4Policy CP6Policy CP7Policy CP9Policy CP11Policy CC01Policy CC02Policy CC03Policy CC07Policy CC08Policy TB21Policy TB23Policy D2Policy IRS4Policy IRS5Policy IRS6Policy GA2
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 58Paragraph 187Paragraph 193Paragraph 116Paragraph 135Paragraph 11
Judgments
Braintree DC v SSCLG and others [2018] EWCA Civ 610

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

54 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Wokingham Borough Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025

  1. Dismissed21 July 20266008845
    Pound Lane Cottage, Pound Lane, Hurst, RG10 0RS
  2. Dismissed9 March 20263361360
    Land West of Limmerhill Road, Wokingham, RG41 4BY
  3. Allowed2 February 20263375029
    1 Halstead Close, Woodley, Wokingham, Berkshire, RG5 4LD
  4. Allowed26 November 20253363174
    178 Bearwood Road, Barkham, Wokingham, RG41 4SH
  5. Dismissed17 September 20253365016
    Dukes Field Cottage Norton Road, Riseley, Reading, RG7 1SH

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.