Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Split Decision7 April 20223288923

11B The Grove, CARNFORTH, LA5 9JE

the construction of an additional storey to an existing dwellinghouse with a maximum roof height of 10.491 metres

Authority
Lancaster City Council
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Ellison H

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Appeal A: whether the proposal would accord with Article 3(1) and Schedule 2, Part 1, Class AA of the Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) (England) Order 2015 (as amended)
  • Appeal B: the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area

What decided it

Appeal A: the unacceptable external appearance caused by the significant increase in height, bulk and mass disrupting the visual consistency of the group of three properties. Appeal B: the sympathetic design of the alterations as subservient additions that would not harm character or appearance.

Framework references: 130

Plan policies cited: Policy DM29 of A Local Plan for Lancaster District 2011-2031, Part Two: Review of the Development Management DPD (July 2020)

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.