Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed23 May 20223289024

165-181 Kensington High St, London, W8 6SH

Planning appeal 3289024 at 165-181 Kensington High St, London, W8 6SH (Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea) was dismissed on 23 May 2022 by Inspector Chalk M, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the proposed development would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the Edwardes Square Scarsdale and Abingdon Conservation Area.

mixed-use development, consisting of a roof extension and rear extensions up to fourth floor to create 8 residential units, 3 serviced apartments and additional office space; retention of retail space at ground floor with replacement shop frontages; creation of a front and rear entrance for commercial and residential access

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Chalk M
Postcode
W8 6SH

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the proposed development would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the Edwardes Square Scarsdale and Abingdon Conservation Area

What decided it

The great weight required by the Framework to be given to the conservation of the designated heritage asset outweighed the public benefits of employment and tourist accommodation arising from the proposed development.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy CL1Policy CL2Policy CL3Policy CL8Policy CL11Policy HC1Policy D1Policy D3Policy D7
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 12

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

At least 823 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022

  1. Dismissed2 October 20233313143
    First, Second and Third Floor Flats, 136 Brompton Road, London, SW3 1HY
  2. Dismissed20 January 20223257158
    City Continental Kensington, 11-13 Penywern Road, Earls Court, London, SW5 9TT
  3. Planning permission granted23 July 20263328929
    Flat 5, 69 Oxford Gardens, London, W10 5UJ
  4. Allowed23 June 20263362698
    Flat 1 at 28 Brunswick Gardens and Flat 2 at 30 Brunswick Gardens, London, W8 4AL
  5. Dismissed15 June 20266001948
    Land to End of Ledbury Mews West, London, W11 2QZ

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.