Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Planning permission granted23 July 20263328929

Flat 5, 69 Oxford Gardens, London, W10 5UJ

Planning appeal 3328929 at Flat 5, 69 Oxford Gardens, London, W10 5UJ (Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea) was allowed on 23 July 2026 by Inspector White P, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the development on the character and appearance of the area.

without planning permission, alterations to the rear dormer and construction of a raised balcony

Appeal type
enforcement · Enforcement Notice
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
White P
Postcode
W10 5UJ

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the development on the character and appearance of the area
  • The effect of the development on the living conditions of neighbouring residents, with respect to privacy

What decided it

The Inspector's acceptance that a planning condition could secure permanent colouring or replacement of the composite decking to match the roof materials, thereby removing the identified harm to the conservation area's character and appearance.

The limited public benefit of improved living conditions for the flat occupier (without safety measures) did not outweigh the less than substantial harm to the conservation area; however, the harm could be remedied by condition, allowing the development to proceed with modifications.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
The London Plan (2021) Policy HC1LP 2024 Policy CD1LP 2024 Policy CD2LP 2024 Policy CD3LP 2024 Policy CD4LP 2024 Policy CD9LP 2024 Policy CD10LP 2024 Policy CD13LP 2024 Policy CD15

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

At least 793 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026

  1. Quashed On Legal Grounds5 May 20263340011
    The Mews, 1A Victoria Gardens, London, W11 3PE
  2. Notice upheld11 February 20263352699
    12-14 Pottery Lane, London, W11 4LZ
  3. Planning permission granted26 January 20263359961
    Land at 23, And 25-27 Earl’s Court Square, London, SW5 9BY
  4. Split Decision26 January 20263359770
    Land at 23, And 25-27 Earl's Court Square, London, SW5 9DA
  5. Notice upheld21 January 20263346283
    23 Drayton Gardens, London, SW10 9RY

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.