Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed4 April 20223289426

66 West End, Wolsingham, DL13 3AP

replacement doors and windows with UPVC

Authority
Durham County Council
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
other · Householder developments
Inspector
Newsome R

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposal on the character or appearance of the host dwelling and the area, with particular regard to the heritage significance of the Wolsingham Conservation Area and the setting of Cherry Tree House

What decided it

The loss of traditional materials through replacement with UPVC and composite solutions would result in less than substantial harm to the significance of the Conservation Area and listed building setting, with minimal public benefits insufficient to outweigh this harm.

Framework references: 199, 202

Plan policies cited: Policy 29, Policy 44

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.