Planning appeal decision
Land to the South of The Ridgeway, Potton, Bedfordshire, SG19 2PS
Planning appeal 3289675 at Land to the South of The Ridgeway, Potton, Bedfordshire, SG19 2PS (Central Bedfordshire) was allowed on 1 August 2022 by Inspector Longmuir J, following an inquiry. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Having regard to the site's allocation for residential development under Policy HA9, whether the scheme now proposed would be acceptable in terms of: its effects on the character and appearance of the area.
97 residential units and 0.5ha of allotments together with associated infrastructure on Local Plan allocation HA9
- Authority
- Central Bedfordshire
- Appeal type
- major · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Inquiry
- Development
- residential · Major dwellings
- Inspector
- Longmuir J
- Postcode
- SG19 2PS
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Having regard to the site's allocation for residential development under Policy HA9, whether the scheme now proposed would be acceptable in terms of: its effects on the character and appearance of the area
- its effect on biodiversity
- the effects of traffic on existing occupiers in surrounding roads
- the effects on green infrastructure
- whether the development would reasonably contribute to accessible and adaptable housing
- whether the proposal would reasonably contribute to self-build housing
What decided it
The site's long-standing allocation for housing under Policy HA9, with the scheme satisfactorily meeting the one disputed allocation criterion (buffer landscaping) and delivering acceptable, mitigated biodiversity and landscape outcomes, meant the proposal accorded with the development plan as a whole.
The very limited weight attached to conflicts with Policies H2 and H6 was outweighed by the proposal's compliance with Policy HA9 and the development plan overall, together with moderate benefits from additional market and affordable housing, leading to the appeal being allowed.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy HA9Policy EE1Policy EE2Policy EE3Policy EE4Policy EE5Policy EE8Policy HQ1Policy HQ2Policy HQ3Policy HQ4Policy H2Policy H4Policy H6Policy HO-1Policy HO-2Policy HO-4Policy EV5Policy EV-6Policy EN-1Policy HQ10Policy Cl-2Policy CC1Policy CC3Policy CC5
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 2Paragraph 11Paragraph 56Paragraph 62Paragraph 92Paragraph 98Paragraph 126Paragraph 130Paragraph 133Paragraph 174Paragraph 179Paragraph 180Paragraph 185
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Central Bedfordshire
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022
- Dismissed29 October 20266009734Whitewood Corner, 7 Drove Road, Gamlingay, Sandy, SG19 2HT
- Allowed15 October 20266009682Land West Of Hurricane Avenue, Lower Stondon, SG16 6NW
- Allowed9 September 202660109292 Palma Close, Dunstable, LU6 1BU
- Dismissed8 September 20266009181Bracken Ley, London Road, Houghton Conquest, MK45 3LP
- Dismissed7 August 20266007254Wheatsheaf Barn, Mount Pleasant, Aspley Guise, MK178JZ
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®