Brices, Well Street, Burghclere, Newbury, Hampshire , RG20 9HR

Planning appeal 3290266 at Brices, Well Street, Burghclere, Newbury, Hampshire , RG20 9HR (Basingstoke and Deane Borough Council) was dismissed on 7 September 2022 by Inspector Cuthbert L, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area.

a 3 bedroom detached house and associated access on the side garden of the existing property

Authority: Basingstoke and Deane Borough Council
Appeal type: minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure: Written Representations
Development: residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector: Cuthbert L
Postcode: RG20 9HR

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area
whether the proposed development would provide satisfactory living conditions for existing and future occupiers, with specific regard to external garden space

What decided it

The substantial harm to the character and appearance of the area caused by the incongruous siting, scale and design of the proposed 2-storey dwelling in a streetscene dominated by single-storey bungalows significantly and demonstrably outweighs the modest housing and economic benefits.

the adverse impacts of harm to character and appearance, ascribed substantial weight as long-lasting, significantly and demonstrably outweighed the benefits of housing delivery, employment, and community support, such that the presumption in favour of sustainable development did not apply

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies: Policy EM1Policy EM10Policy B3Policy B5
National Planning Policy Framework: Paragraph 11Paragraph 130
Judgments: Dartford BC v SSCLG [2016] EWHC 635

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

Appeals plan, £15 a month

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

15 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision

An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter — Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.

Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app — Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.

Start your free trial

More decisions in Basingstoke and Deane

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022

Dismissed26 October 20266011048
Purdues Farm, Mortimer Lane, Fair Oak Green, Stratfield Saye, RG7 2DL
Allowed26 October 20266007550
75 Park Prewett Road, Basingstoke, RG24 9RG
Dismissed20 October 20266011464
Old Kiln House, Silchester Road, Tadley, RG263PX
Dismissed13 October 20266011822
Spindles, Winchester Road, Burghclere, RG20 9DX
Dismissed13 October 20266011099
Locksbridge Farm, Cufaude Lane, Bramley, RG26 5DL

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.