Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed13 February 20233290308

Old Vicarage, Sudbrook Lane, RICHMOND, TW10 7AT

for the erection of rear extension

Authority
Richmond Upon Thames London Borough Council
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Preston C

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the proposal would amount to inappropriate development within the MOL
  • The effect of the proposal on the openness of the MOL
  • Whether the proposal would preserve or enhance the character and appearance of the building and the CA and the effect on the setting of nearby listed buildings
  • If the proposal does amount to inappropriate development, whether any harm in that respect, and any other harm, is outweighed by other material considerations such as to amount to the very special circumstances needed to justify the proposal

What decided it

The proposal constitutes inappropriate development within the MOL that would cause substantial harm to openness and harm to a Building of Townscape Merit, with no very special circumstances to justify approval.

Framework references: 137, 148, 149, 150

Plan policies cited: Policy G3 of the London Plan (2021), Policy LP13 of the Richmond Local Plan (2018), Policy LP1 of the Local Plan (2018), Policy LP4 of the Local Plan (2018)

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.