Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed13 February 20233290308

Old Vicarage, Sudbrook Lane, Richmond, TW10 7AT

Planning appeal 3290308 at Old Vicarage, Sudbrook Lane, Richmond, TW10 7AT (Richmond Upon Thames London Borough Council) was dismissed on 13 February 2023 by Inspector Preston C, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the proposal would amount to inappropriate development within the MOL.

for the erection of rear extension

Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Preston C
Postcode
TW10 7AT

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the proposal would amount to inappropriate development within the MOL
  • The effect of the proposal on the openness of the MOL
  • Whether the proposal would preserve or enhance the character and appearance of the building and the CA and the effect on the setting of nearby listed buildings
  • If the proposal does amount to inappropriate development, whether any harm in that respect, and any other harm, is outweighed by other material considerations such as to amount to the very special circumstances needed to justify the proposal

What decided it

The proposal constitutes inappropriate development within the MOL that would cause substantial harm to openness and harm to a Building of Townscape Merit, with no very special circumstances to justify approval.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy G3 of the London Plan (2021)Policy LP13 of the Richmond Local Plan (2018)Policy LP1 of the Local Plan (2018)Policy LP4 of the Local Plan (2018)
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 137Paragraph 148Paragraph 149Paragraph 150

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

307 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Richmond upon Thames

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2023

  1. Dismissed26 October 20266011874
    61-63 Petersham Road, Richmond Upon Thames, TW10 6UT
  2. Dismissed6 August 20266007949
    The Lensbury, Broom Road, London, TW11 9NU
  3. Split Decision10 March 20263333609
    Pontoon and Land Adjacent to Richmond Bridge Pier, Richmond Riverside, Richmond, TW9 1TH
  4. Allowed27 January 20266001465
    The Boathouse, Ranelagh Drive, Twickenham, TW1 1QZ
  5. Dismissed21 August 20243345719
    57 Rosecroft Gardens, London, TW2 7PT

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.