Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed9 August 20223290358

433-439 Uxbridge Road, SOUTHALL, UB1 3ET

the demolition of office/ storage and change of use from selling and display of motor vehicles to construction of a block comprising of 7 self contained units with, cycle, bin store and amenity space

Authority
London Borough of Ealing
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Phillips B

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the development on the character and appearance of the surrounding area
  • the effect of the proposal on the living conditions of the occupants of neighbouring properties, having particular regard to noise and disturbance, outlook, light and privacy
  • whether the proposal would provide adequate living conditions for future occupiers, with respect to the quality of internal and outdoor space
  • whether the proposed development would make adequate provision for inclusive and accessible accommodation
  • whether the proposal would provide appropriate facilities for cycle parking
  • the effect of the development on highway safety, with particular regard to parking

What decided it

The cumulative weight of harm to character and appearance, neighbouring living conditions, future occupier amenity, accessibility, cycle provision and highway safety, which together outweighed the limited benefits of the scheme.

Plan policies cited: Policy 7.4, Policy 7B, Policy 1.1, Policy 1.2, Policy 2.1, Policy D3, Policy D4, Policy D8, Policy G5, Policy D14, Policy D6, Policy 7A, Policy 3.5, Policy 7D, Policy SI 8, Policy D7, Policy H2, Policy T5, Policy T4, Policy T6

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.