Town Planner Pro
Free trial
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Notice varied and upheld19 March 20263290410

Land and Buildings to the Rear of 243-265 Bromley Road, London, SE6 2RA

Planning appeal 3290410 at Land and Buildings to the Rear of 243-265 Bromley Road, London, SE6 2RA (London Borough of Lewisham) was allowed in part (a split decision) on 19 March 2026 by Inspector King T, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the development on the character and appearance of the area.

Erection of 8 dwelling houses (conversion of building from storage use to residential use)

Authority
London Borough of Lewisham
Appeal type
enforcement · Enforcement Notice
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
King T
Postcode
SE6 2RA

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the development on the character and appearance of the area
  • The living conditions of the existing occupiers, having regard to the standard of accommodation and the living conditions of neighbouring occupiers, having regard to privacy

What decided it

The dwellings' failure to meet minimum space standards and lack of adequate external amenity space constitute unacceptable standards of accommodation that conflict with adopted development plan policies, making the development unacceptable in its current form.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Lewisham Local Plan Policy QD1Lewisham Local Plan Policy QD6Lewisham Local Plan Policy QD8Lewisham Local Plan Policy QD10London Plan Policy D3London Plan Policy D6
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 135

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

Appeals plan, £15 a month

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

366 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Lewisham

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026

  1. Quashed On Legal Grounds29 July 20263350448
    Bestfood Supermarket, 30 Loampit Hill, London, SE13 7SW
  2. Quashed On Legal Grounds11 March 20263352755
    222 Verdant Lane, London, SE6 1TN
  3. Notice varied and upheld26 February 20263342757
    11 Dunkery Road, London, SE9 4HX
  4. Notice varied and upheld16 February 20263355454
    51 Sydenham Road, London, SE26 5EX
  5. Notice varied and upheld6 January 20263341707
    95 Grangemill Road, London, SE6 3LA

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.