Planning appeal decision
Bestfood Supermarket, 30 Loampit Hill, London, SE13 7SW
Planning appeal 3350448 at Bestfood Supermarket, 30 Loampit Hill, London, SE13 7SW (London Borough of Lewisham) was decided (quashed on legal grounds) on 29 July 2026 by Inspector Whalley J, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the matters alleged in the enforcement notice constitute a breach of planning control, specifically whether the works to the shop front amounted to development requiring planning permission or were merely maintenance and repair works.
Enlargement to the front of the property (a front extension)
- Authority
- London Borough of Lewisham
- Appeal type
- enforcement · Enforcement Notice
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- retail · Other minor developments
- Inspector
- Whalley J
- Postcode
- SE13 7SW
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the matters alleged in the enforcement notice constitute a breach of planning control, specifically whether the works to the shop front amounted to development requiring planning permission or were merely maintenance and repair works
What decided it
The Inspector's finding that the works to the shop front, whilst extensive, did not amount to works of replacement, rebuilding or material extension, and therefore did not constitute development requiring planning permission under section 55(2)(a) of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990.
What the Inspector cited
- Judgments
- Sainty v Minister of Housing and Local Government; CW Larkin v Basildon District Council; Arnold v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government [2015] EWHC 1197 (Admin); Tapecrown Ltd v First Secretary of State [2006] EWCA Civ 1744
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in London Borough of Lewisham
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026
- Notice varied and upheld19 March 20263290410Land and Buildings to the Rear of 243-265 Bromley Road, London, SE6 2RA
- Quashed On Legal Grounds11 March 20263352755222 Verdant Lane, London, SE6 1TN
- Notice varied and upheld26 February 2026334275711 Dunkery Road, London, SE9 4HX
- Notice varied and upheld16 February 2026335545451 Sydenham Road, London, SE26 5EX
- Notice varied and upheld6 January 2026334170795 Grangemill Road, London, SE6 3LA
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®