Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed30 March 20233290524

227 Hoe Street, London, E17 9PP

Planning appeal 3290524 at 227 Hoe Street, London, E17 9PP (Waltham Forest London Borough Council) was allowed on 30 March 2023 by Inspector Symmons J, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the living conditions of future occupiers of the proposal would be acceptable in respect of internal space.

conversion of the upper floors of the property to form two self-contained flats along with the construction of dormer roof extension to main rear roof, together with installation of three roof lights to front roof and the construction of ground floor rear extension to provide refuse storage

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Other minor developments
Inspector
Symmons J
Postcode
E17 9PP

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the living conditions of future occupiers of the proposal would be acceptable in respect of internal space
  • whether the proposal would provide sufficient refuse and recycling storage
  • whether car-free development would be secured, having regard to the proposal's effect on the highway and to sustainable travel

What decided it

The proposal complies with all three main issues: internal space standards are met, refuse storage is adequate given site constraints and collection frequency, and car-free development is secured through a condition restricting parking permits for one flat while maintaining excellent public transport accessibility.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy CS13Policy CS15Policy DM7Policy CS6Policy DM32Policy CS7Policy DM14Policy DM16Policy T5

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

511 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Waltham Forest London Borough Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2023

  1. Dismissed28 September 20266011324
    L/A to 2 Claremont Road, London, E17 5RJ
  2. Dismissed18 September 20266011375
    Land to R/O 34-40 Hillcrest Road, Walthamstow, E17 4AP
  3. Allowed21 July 20266006927
    8 Mulberry Close, Chingford, London, E4 8BS
  4. Allowed16 July 20266007500
    38 Second Avenue, Walthamstow, London, E17 9QH
  5. Dismissed22 May 20266003136
    52 Withy Mead, Chingford, Waltham Forest, E4 6JZ

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.