Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed12 April 20233290769

Mousehole Fishing Lakes, Maidstone Road, Nettlestead, MAIDSTONE, ME18 5HR

erection of detached annexe as part of existing fishery enterprise

Authority
Maidstone Borough Council
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Kean G

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the proposal is inappropriate development in the Green Belt
  • The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the main dwelling and wider area
  • Whether the proposal would be acceptably sited in an area of high flood risk
  • If inappropriate development, whether the harm by reason of inappropriateness and any other harm is clearly outweighed by other considerations, including any functional need for it, so as to amount to very special circumstances necessary to justify the development

What decided it

The proposal constitutes inappropriate development in the Green Belt that would cause material harm to openness and character, with no very special circumstances demonstrated to justify it, and it fails the flood risk exception test for more vulnerable development.

Framework references: 137, 144, 145, 149, 148, 164

Plan policies cited: Policy SP17, Policy DM1, Policy DM30, Policy DM32, Policy DM34

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.