Planning appeal decision
The Three Pines, Gibbs Hill, Maidstone, ME18 5HS
Demolition of existing garage and outbuildings; extensions to front, rear and side of existing building; replacement of existing roof and windows; internal alterations
- Authority
- Maidstone Borough Council
- Appeal type
- householder · Householder (HAS)
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Householder developments
- Inspector
- Glaister C
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt for the purposes of the development plan and the National Planning Policy Framework (2021)
- the effect of the proposal on the openness of the Green Belt
- the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the host dwelling, and the surrounding area
- if the proposal would be inappropriate development, whether the harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, is clearly outweighed by other considerations so as to amount to the very special circumstances necessary to justify it
What decided it
The proposal constitutes inappropriate development in the Green Belt by reason of disproportionate additions to the original building, and the identified harms to openness and character and appearance are not clearly outweighed by other considerations.
Framework references: 147, 148, 149
Plan policies cited: Policy SP 17, Policy DM 1, Policy DM 30, Policy DM 32
The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®