Planning appeal decision
Rose Cottage, Dunsden, Oxfordshire, RG4 9PS
Planning appeal 3291164 at Rose Cottage, Dunsden, Oxfordshire, RG4 9PS (South Oxfordshire District Council) was dismissed on 25 May 2022 by Inspector G F Self, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the proposed roof extension and single storey extension would constitute permitted development under the Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) Order.
Roof extension and single storey extension
- Authority
- South Oxfordshire District Council
- Appeal type
- ldc · Lawful Development Certificate
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Householder developments
- Inspector
- G F Self
- Postcode
- RG4 9PS
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the proposed roof extension and single storey extension would constitute permitted development under the Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) Order
What decided it
The proposed extensions would extend beyond the plane of the principal elevation (south) of the dwelling which fronts Row Lane, thereby breaching the exclusionary criteria in Classes A and B of the GPDO.
The decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in South Oxfordshire
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022
- Dismissed29 October 20266013107Charleston, Bolney Road, Lower Shiplake, RG9 3NS
- Dismissed29 October 202660055614 Spring Path, Thame, OX9 2EF
- Allowed26 October 20266011152Luffield House, 85A Wallingford Road, Goring, RG8 0HL
- Dismissed7 October 20266007830Land off Wyfold Lane, Peppard Common, RG9 5LR
- Allowed7 October 20266005521Land Rear of The Paddocks, Lower Icknield Way, Chinnor, OX39 4GR
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®